From: WW
Date: 12/18/2002
Time: 7:21:08 PM
Remote Name: 213.249.145.174
Nice one Tom, i think some meat has been/ is being put on the bones of this discussion.I await with interest to see if anyone challenges these views,most of which i agree. For starters,I am interested in the transition from aerobic to anaerobic work,the likelihood of injury as a result of getting the transition wrong,the mix(microcycling) of hill work down hill work sand hill work for the individual again according to the individuals strengths and weaknesses.Is there a safer way of maintaining track specific technique and speed(during the winter) so that any cross over from aerobic to anaerobic becomes less difficult and therefore reduces the chance of injury.Or is this notion in itself incorrect? Are we actually suggesting there maybe be a greater overload in terms of high mileage in comparison to low mileage high intensity etc or vice versa, which may affect the height of the peak attained BUT increase the risk of injury, what would Mihaly igloi and Frank Stampfl think of all this mileage training?How about Jim Ryun...I hope there is more room for discussion on this point and Tom dont get it all his own way. How about some personal examples from the athletes out there and not all this history of athletics and text book stuff!!
The devils advocate.
BOT="FormInsertHere" DESCR="The FrontPage FormInsertHere Component indicates the point in an HTML file where you want a default, Registration, or Discussion Component to insert new results." BOT="Include" U-Include="../_private/discussion_aftr.htm"